Platform: It’s time to start curbing our creative licence

When it comes to job descriptions, people in the public relations industry have a tendency to oversuse the ’C’ word, says Mike Hobbs.

When it comes to job descriptions, people in the public relations

industry have a tendency to oversuse the ’C’ word, says Mike Hobbs.



There’s been much talk in PR Week recently about the use of creativity

in the profession (any awards-based article or issue always provides a

flotilla of examples). It’s a misnomer and, along with others in

everyday use, stems from advertising.



The principal meaning of creative, according to three dictionaries

(Oxford, Penguin and Readers’ Digest) is ’having the power or ability to

create, to bring into existence’ - this doesn’t fit with the main tenets

of PR.



Our job is to build awareness of a project, product or idea, not to

create it in the first place.



When people mention creativity in respect of PR, I believe what they

really mean is innovation. This should not be taken as degrading - being

innovative in devising ways of bringing a message into the public arena

is a considerable skill and should not be downplayed - but increasing

awareness and sales through good PR is in some ways the very antithesis

of creativity.



Because true creativity, by its nature, allows whoever practises it to

explore the limits of their imagination without fetters. This doesn’t

mean that artistic endeavours are unplanned or lacking structure but

that artists must always feel free to move beyond those structures. Good

- or even great - public relations has no such leeway.



The discipline of focusing all joint efforts in a PR campaign towards

putting across a simple message (or series of messages) effectively

cannot allow us to stray from the agreed brief. We may be innovative in

how we interpret that brief. We may come up with great ideas to

reinforce the central theme, but we are still bound to our core

task.



I’m not for one moment saying there are no creative people working in PR

- of course there are, legion upon legion. Yet I would contend that even

the most famous examples - the Bells, Gummers, Hehirs, Harleys,

Borkowskis, Cliffords, Freuds, Greenwoods, Brends and Inghams of this

world actually express their creativity in differing ways outside PR. In

business, everything must be subsumed in the general drive towards

getting the best possible results for our clients.



This is equally true of advertising. There are any number of advertising

people with their showreels and CVs geared towards displaying their

creativity - indeed, many of them have the word in their job title.

Don’t be fooled - their business, even more than ours, has to be geared

towards selling and showing quick results. Salesmanship is at variance

with creativity and ad men and women are merely indulging in wish

fulfilment. Let them express their creative urges in their spare

time.



I feel this point is important because we’re involved in putting across

our messages using three crucial tools - words, images and sound. It’s

necessary to call for an agreement on how we use words because these are

the tools most open to misinterpretation - images and sound are more

understood, due to their very directness.



So, if we can’t use vital words properly, can we complain if we’re

misunderstood?



Or indeed, if others misuse words consistently, with more devious

intentions in mind? It may seem a long way from the innocent touting of

innovation under the guise of creativity to the supposed black arts of

spin doctors, but they are horses from the same stable. Can we bolt the

door on creativity before it goes?



Mike Hobbs is managing director of Westword, specialising in sports,

arts and media. He is also a screenwriter and freelance journalist.



Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in