COMMENT: Platform; Making too much ado about crises

Crisis management should be about protecting corporate reputations, not promoting PR skills, says Peter Sheldon Green

Crisis management should be about protecting corporate reputations, not

promoting PR skills, says Peter Sheldon Green

It is to be applauded that crisis management has become a part of

corporate agendas and that, in the main, the PR industry has been

recognised as a prime source of crisis management skills, but we should

remember that the aim of crisis management is to protect corporate

reputation and to limit damage -not to show off communications skills

for their own sake.

Enlightened management knows that action must be taken in a crisis, but

it doesn’t always know exactly what action. However, we, in the PR

business, have learned to apply a whole range of techniques aimed at

protecting reputations in crisis and herein lies a major danger. We have

become so good at leaping into action in a crisis strike that all too

often we become more concerned with what we can do, rather than with why

it should be done.

Crises are exciting times for PR people: budgets are invariably

generous, management is co-operative, the media is pushing you for copy

instead of the other way around, and you are right at the centre of the

action. It is not surprising that, at this time, one is inclined to take

every action that seems in any way appropriate.

Less admirably but, unfortunately true, is the fact that during a crisis

any consultant must be aware, at some level, that the more he or she

does, then the bigger the fees are likely to be.

So a combination of factors leads to an attitude which says ‘because it

can be done it should be done’, and never is this attitude stronger than

when ‘crisis experts’ are called in to deliver quick solutions to a

situation which has already reached crisis proportions.

Crisis management experts do their clients no favours if they operate

programmes which are tactically highly successful, but strategically

ill- conceived. Of course sometimes, high-profile, maximum-intensity

action is required, but not always.

A great number of crises are avoidable, provided proper reputation risk

management programmes have been put in place and run on a regular basis.

Even when the unavoidable crisis has occurred it does not follow that

the best strategy is one which involves heroic action on a grand scale.

Crisis management professionals know this, but far too many PR

practitioners carry well developed PR attitudes into crisis management -

attitudes which have been formed in an environment where gaining

coverage is a primary aim.

In many ways the very term ‘crisis management’ pinpoints the failings of

much of the PR industry’s approach to the whole subject. Crisis

management is simply the sharp end of a continuing programme which

should incorporate issue management, reputation risk management,

preparation and training for crisis.

If a significant part of the PR industry continues to peddle high-

profile, quick-fix solutions when crises occur; if some practitioners

continue to offer a service which is beyond their experience and

knowledge; if we fail to position reputation risk management as a

continuing and legitimate discipline rather than just another PR bolt-

on, then we will continue a long and sorry PR tradition - shooting

ourselves in the foot while grabbing for a quick buck.

Peter Sheldon Green is MD of Sheldon Communications and author of

‘Reputation Risk Management’

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in