Mental health campaigner urges PR agencies to sign up to Media Charter to promote 'responsible' discussion

A leading mental health campaigner has told PRWeek on World Mental Health Day that PR agencies should consider signing up to new guidelines that aim to create a more responsible and helpful public discussion around the topic.

Mental health campaigner urges PR agencies to sign up to Media Charter to promote 'responsible' discussion

Natasha Devon, who was made an MBE last year and spent a period as a mental health adviser to the UK's Department of Education, is launching the Mental Health Media Charter today.

The Charter was put together with the help of Samaritans, Mental Health First Aid England and Beat and has been endorsed by other groups.

While primarily orientated towards media outlets and bloggers, Devon told PRWeek: "I think it would be wonderful for PR agencies to be aware of and sign up to these guidelines - after all, they’re generating the press releases that give birth to so much of the news."

Organisations signing up to the charter will be added to a list of signatories, which will be updated weekly and circulated by Devon on social media. They will also be allowed to use a specially designed 'stamp of approval' on their website and social media.

Those interested in signing should contact Devon via her website.

The full charter is reproduced below.

The Charter

Mission Statement

In endorsing the Mental Health Media Charter you are signalling that you are committed to reporting stories relating to mental health responsibly, helpfully and in a way that takes into account the needs of the most vulnerable members of the population. You are acknowledging the power of language and imagery in shaping social attitudes and declaring your intention to genuinely educate and to reduce stigma around mental illness.

If you work in a high-pressure, high turnover press office, it is understood that occasionally headlines or pictures will ‘slip through the net’.

However, by signing up to the charter you are confirming you will do your best not to:

1. Use the phrase 'commit suicide' or 'successful suicide'

The term ‘commit’ suggests criminality and blame. We now understand that suicide happens when pain exceeds resources for coping with pain. It is not a criminal act in the UK and has not been since 1961.

'Successful suicide' contravenes what we now understand about the act – most people who take their own life are ambivalent, in that part of them wants to live.

Better alternatives: 'Attempted/completed suicide', 'took/ended their own life', or even 'killed themselves'.

2. Show 'before' images in eating disorder stories or pictures which could be triggering to people who self-harm

For people who are in a healthy mindset, seeing 'before' pictures of people in the grips of anorexia or who have self-harmed can act as a deterrent. However, for people who are either experiencing, or in recovery from eating disorders or self-harm we now understand that these pictures can become something to ‘aspire to’.

3. Use the term 'anorexics', 'bulimics', 'depressives' or 'schizophrenics'

It is important to understand that a person is distinct from their illness. To label someone an 'anorexic' for example, suggests that they are defined by their eating disorder. This is not only unhelpful in terms of the way they are perceived by others, but it might also hinder their recovery process.

Better alternative: 'people experiencing anorexia/bulimia/depression/psychosis'.

4. Give too much detail on suicide/self-harm or eating disorder methodology

We now understand that giving a lot of detail about how people have harmed themselves can inspire imitational behaviour – there is a delicate balance to be struck with your responsibility to report the facts of the case.

Try to avoid going into too much detail, which will ensure the report is safe for all audiences. As a general rule, stories should focus on 'whys', not 'hows'.

5. Use generic terms like 'mental health issues' when describing terrorists and other violent criminals

Ninety nine per cent of people with mental illnesses are more likely to harm themselves than others. In establishing a link between generic poor mental health and terrorism/violent crime, stigma and fear is increased. Instead, be specific – what mental health 'issue' did the perpetrator have? Was it in fact a personality disorder (being a psychopath or a sociopath is not technically a 'mental illness')?

You might also add a disclaimer along the lines of 'note: most people with mental health 'issues'/personality disorders would not commit a crime of this nature, which occur as a result of a rare combination of circumstances'.

...and you will do your best to

6. Understand the difference between mental health and mental ill health.

Everyone with a brain has a mental health, just as everyone with a body has a physical health. By using the term 'mental health' to describe mental illness, an important discussion which impacts 100 per cent of the population is effectively confined to one quarter of it.

Instead of 'battles with mental health' it is therefore much more helpful to say 'issues with mental ill health', so that the public can understand the distinction.

7. Include links to good quality sources of support if content might trigger the need for help in a reader.

The best charities and support organisations ensure their web forums are monitored for triggering content (ie users sharing self-harm or suicide techniques). They do not promote one form of therapy for financial gain, but instead describe various treatment methods. They base their content on reliable evidence and have good links with research institutions.

Charities who have this ethos and you may wish to signpost to include: Young Minds, The Samaritans, CALMThe Mix, The Self-Harm Network, B-eat, Mind.

Read next: World Mental Health Day - why PR pros could benefit from counselling

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in