The survey by digital marketing agency Greenlight spoke to around 1,000 UK consumers aged 16 to 60-plus, broken down equally by gender. It asked questions about London 2012 and showed almost half of respondents (47%) unaffected by whether or not a brand was a sponsor and as many as 18% not even noticing sponsor brands. This was despite brands spending between £10m ($13m) and £64m ($85m).
Among the 2012 winners were big-spenders Coca-Cola and McDonald’s with 42% and 38% of people, respectively, remembering their presence in at the London games four years ago.
However, one of London 2012’s biggest sponsors, Acer, had zero recall for the UK consumers surveyed while only 11% remembered P&G’s "Mother" campaign. Only 17% of UK consumers remembered Samsung’s involvement in the 2012 events.
Rio 2016: The IOC is shooting itself in the foot with its Rule 40 threats
Brands ready to pursue Olympic marketing glory in Rio
Greenlight said the younger audience was the most receptive of sports sponsorship – 49% of 16-29 year olds feel their opinion of a brand would be improved if they were to sponsor the games, the highest of any age group.
The survey also showed that TV still rules when it comes to long-term impact but stunts are a forgettable marketing option. As many as 30% of those surveyed said they remember a brand’s sponsorship from TV. Product design was second with 21% of people remembering a brand’s sponsorship after seeing it on a product.
Greenlight said 18% of consumers remember sponsor brands’ marketing via the imagery they used and 17% remembered brands from online advertising. This was followed by social media on 11%, a figure likely to rise this time round. But stunts were remember by only 10% of respondents.
TV remains key in 2016 with Greenlight saying 73% of respondents intend to watch the 2016 Games on TV. Meanwhile 23% said online content will be their go-to and 16% cited social media as a key channel for 2016.
This article first appeared on PRWeek sister title Campaign
.jpg)
