WEEKLY WEB WATCH: Internet tax bill rumor sparks debate, other bills in Congress

The Internet can be a pretty surreal world at the best of times.

The Internet can be a pretty surreal world at the best of times.

The Internet can be a pretty surreal world at the best of


But last week the sense of unreality was raised by several degrees, not

by any dotty dot-com or mind-dizzying technology developed in Silicon

Valley, but at the other end of the country - by Congress.

The House passed a bill, HR 1291, or the ’Internet Access Charge

Prohibition Act of 2000,’ which essentially forbids the Federal

Communications Commission from imposing any kind of per-minute tax on

people’s use of the Internet.

This is something the FCC says it had no intention of ever doing


The reason for this seemingly strange use of the House’s time is that a

great many people, ordinary citizens, had been wasting their elected

representatives’ time, protesting against what they believed to be the

imminent imposition of such a tax.

It all started, as so many things do nowadays, with an e-mail. This

particular e-mail, one of those ’e-mail your representative now or the

world as we know it is going to end’ sort of e-mails, has in fact been

doing the rounds on the Internet in various forms for at least four

years. It gives details of a bill sponsored by Congressman Tony Schnell

to place a tax on people’s use of the Internet. The only problem is that

there has never been any such bill, nor is there any Congressman

Schnell. Nevertheless, as one or two lawmakers noted in the reporting of

the story last week, Tony Schnell and the fictitious Internet tax

generated more response from constituents than some genuine issues.

This is probably not the first time that Congress has devoted time to

myth and rumor - ’Kuwait is a democracy deserving of our protection’ -

but it probably is the first time it has deliberately passed a law in an

attempt to squash a rumor. Michigan Democrat John D. Dingell called it

’a fabricated solution to an imaginary problem.’

So why on earth waste legislative time over a non-issue? The reason is

that this imaginary problem could have turned out to be fairly


People like their Internet, and they would certainly like it to remain

as free as possible. And nobody likes taxes. The natural instinct of any

politician is, right up until the moment it comes to the vote, to

distance themselves as far as possible from the idea of taxes. And it’s

not often that politicians get to paint themselves in white before there

is even any mud-slinging around, especially over an issue that, as far

as they can tell, is not going to come back and bite them in the butt

down the line.

Except that it may yet come back and bite them. Apart from anything

else, this action is likely only to fuel rumors, not end them. Already

people are asking about some wording at the end of the bill that

excludes Internet telephony services from any tax ban.

At the moment, while a few politicians spend their time getting all

worked up about online drug or porn sites, most know that their

constituents see the Internet as ’a good thing.’ And if their

constituents see it as a good thing then they’re all for it. But the

real Internet issue that is going to divide Capitol Hill is not any tax

on access but whether or not sales tax should apply to online purchases,

and how. Either way, a lot of politicians are going to make themselves

mighty unpopular when it comes to a vote.

Meanwhile, the writer of that original e-mail must be feeling quite


- Stovin Hayter is editor-in-chief of Revolution. He can be contacted at


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in