ANALYSIS: Media Watch - Political moderation is forecasted afterSenate shake-up

Senator James Jeffords of Vermont seemed to have the media world at

his feet when he announced his departure from the Republican Party,

thereby handing control of the Senate to the Democrats.

By all accounts, little has rivaled Jeffords' decision to become an

independent in terms of its impact on national politics.

Editorials from newspapers across the country weighed in with their take

on the significance of the move. Coverage most often addressed the

impact Jeffords' decision would have on the country, rather than what

the change of party meant to Jeffords personally. Overall editorial

coverage was positive, depicting the change as good news for America,

trumpeting the benefits of checks and balances in government.

However, the tone of the coverage varied from newspaper to


The Buffalo News (May 25) offered a fairly even-handed forecast: "The

likely outcome, indeed, will be a more centrist Senate and more centrist

legislative policies." In contrast, the St. Petersburg Times (May 25)

took a bit of a jab at the GOP as it wrote, "You can bet bipartisanship

will be more than lip service to the Bush administration now."

More than half of the editorials analyzed believed that the Bush

administration had not been flexible in promoting bipartisan legislation

while Republicans controlled the White House and both houses of


The San Francisco Chronicle (May 24) criticized Bush for not following

through on his promise to be a "uniter, not a divider." "As much as he

talked about bipartisanship and outreach, President Bush has governed

decidedly from the right since taking office in January." The Denver

Post (May 25) agreed, "Since the election, the moderate (Bush) has

morphed into a prisoner of the party's right wing."

As far as coverage about Jeffords himself, the media were sympathetic to

his case that he was forced out of the GOP, as his moderate views became

increasingly at odds with the conservative Republican initiatives.

Coverage recounted tales of various incidents of "backstabbing" (USA

Today, May 24) Jeffords had suffered at the hands of Republicans for not

being in lockstep with his party. From the point of view of the

Republican Party, the defection was a PR disaster. The New York Times

(May 24) viewed Jeffords' actions as "an embarrassing lesson on how not

to take someone for granted," especially given the even split in the

Senate and the absolute need for every Republican vote it could get.

Other newspapers viewed the news from Bush's point of view and wrote

that "the upshot of all this is that the president and his party lose

significant power to advance their legislative agenda" (Omaha

World-Herald, May 24).

Only a handful of editorials addressed their discontent with the timing

of Jeffords' decision to change parties. These papers felt that Jeffords

should have made his views known before the November elections. The

Courier-Journal (Louisville, KY) (May 25) lamented, "We wish this

transfer of power had occurred through the ballot box."

If media coverage is any indication, politics is set to become more

moderate and bipartisan.

Evaluation and analysis by CARMA International. Media Watch can be found


Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in