ANALYSIS: Corporate Affairs - US companies must clear up ties tobin Laden family

One of the trickiest problems in the war against terror involves

the ties that bind the bin Laden family with major US corporations.

What's at stake, and how should companies address the issue? Allen

Houston reports

A new patriotic fervor has swept the shores of the United States. Old

Glory has been reintroduced into the national consciousness, and now

hangs in silent resistance from doorways, car antennas, backpacks, and

office windows across the country. Floundering only a month ago,

President Bush has leapt to a historical 90% approval rating.

And it is against this background of partriotism that a handful of

reputable corporations have found themselves suddenly saddled with one

of the scariest threats to a corporate reputation: an apparent link to

the enemy. A litany of stories published in the last two weeks in

publications such as The Wall Street Journal and The Boston Globe have

found links between the bin Laden name and corporations such as Snapple,

Motorola, Nortel, and GE.

The bin Laden (Baud) corporation, with profits of $5 billion in

2000, is as recognizable in Saudi Arabia as Microsoft is in the US.

Baud's fingers extend through hundreds of industries, including

construction, communications, and mining, and it has business links with

more than 50 US companies.

The bin Laden family severed ties with Osama during the Gulf War, and

has stated its condemnation of the black sheep of the family on several

occasions. But as the nation recovers from the terrorist attacks of

September 11, these American companies better have a communications plan

to explain themselves to the public, shareholders, and employees if they

don't want to suffer their own collateral damage.

"This is a huge problem for these companies," says Lou Colasuonno,

partner at Westhill Media Strategies, a crisis communications firm. "The

bin Laden name is toxic; it's like having your brand associated with

Hitler or Stalin. Any US companies with ties to Baud should treat these

connections as if they were a third rail."

One company that has tackled the issue head-on is Dutch bank ABN Amro,

which provides banking capabilities to the bin Laden family. A

spokesperson for the bank admitted that "simply having the bin Laden

name is a reputation risk." The bank has also said it is currently

reviewing its relationship with the bin Laden family.

But what of Snapple, Motorola, and the others that have been linked with

the bin Laden name? Is the situation toxic for these companies?

"Potentially yes, but it doesn't have to be," says Simon Moore,

assistant professor of English at Bentley College and coauthor of the

book Effective Crisis Management: Worldwide Principle and Practice.

Moore believes that a company doing business with the Baud should

prepare a statement thoroughly detailing its connection to the bin Laden

family, and send it to investors, the public, and various media groups.

He also recommends highlighting that the family is law-abiding, that the

company has investigated the connection fully, and that the company

won't hesitate to take action if anything inappropriate emerges. Moore

also suggests that the company indicate its full support of any future

action that the authorities may take.

The myriad approaches

That kind of honest and straightforward approach is already being

employed by Harvard University, which accepted a $2 million

endowment for the study of Islamic Architecture and Law from a bin Laden

family member. "What I've been trying to do is separate fact from

fiction," says Joe Wrinn, director of public affairs at Harvard

University. "We've been very straightforward about conveying the facts.

I point reporters to our website, where they can find information about

the fellowships. We have been addressing the concerns that people might

have when they first hear about the endowments. We talk to anybody and

everybody who calls, and I've even told people to read the Wall Street

Journal story."

While some agencies advocate this simple, forthright approach, others -

such as Nichols-Dezenhall, a Washington, DC crisis communications firm

that has clients who do business with the Baud group - counsel their

clients to provide documentation of their investigations into the bin

Laden family, as well as draw attention to the rumors and

misinformation. "Whenever you have a scary force and there are no

immediate resolutions, the press searches for ways to turn that

something unfamiliar and scary into something familiar," explains Eric

Dezenhall, president of Nichols-Dezenhall and author of Nail Em!

Confronting High Profile attacks on Celebrities and Businesses. "In

times of great anxiety, the populace ascribes all events to a villain.

Until Osama bin Laden is found and killed, you are going to find these

vague allegations in the press, and companies had better be prepared to

knock them down hard and fast."

Going beyond due diligence and bringing in an outside third party like

the Department of Justice to make sure there's no connection between the

family and its terrorist kin is the best way to refute these allegations

and clear your company name, says Marc Shannon, partner and director of

Ketchum's DC office. "The absolute worst thing that can happen to a

company is if it is not prepared. All of these companies should have had

a communications plan ready just in case of such an emergency. Then

again, in the US we always expect a higher level of flawlessness from

our companies when we're looking backwards."

Answering questions that a company's workers have should be another

priority of the media relations groups. Shannon believes that companies

doing business with the bin Laden family should bring in corporate

security teams to inform the workers that the company is concerned with

their safety "because there are a lot of people angry and acting

irrationally right now." He believes that these companies should then

say, "We think it would be unfair to the bin Laden family to cut off our

work with them. Here's what we've done to make sure the money is not

going to the terrorists, and here's what we are going to do to protect


Investigation was at the core of GE's message. The company provides the

Baud group with equipment for its power companies, and also holds a

minority stake in one of its companies. Greg Sheffer, a spokesperson for

GE, says that the company has consulted with the treasury department,

completed its own investigation, and has been straightforward in

delivering its message that "we take our responsibility not to do

business with terrorists very seriously. We are confident that the bin

Laden family has cut off connections with Osama."

Committing to cutting ties

According to Colasuonno, there are no halfway issues here. If a company

was unaware that it had ties with the bin Laden family, it should be

forthright and admit that. But Colasuonno also warns about hysteria. "I

don't think you can tick off every Arabic vendor out of fear. It's rash

and stereotyping, and we shouldn't run from our connections with the

Arab community."

It's hard to argue with his approach, or with the ridiculousness of

attacking a family for being related to an evil person. But only the

future will tell how a business relationship with the most reviled name

in the US could impact the bottom lines of certain companies.


- The Wall Street Journal, September 19: "Black Sheep of a blue-chip


MSNBC, September 19: "Black Sheep of a blue-chip family"

Arizona Republic, September 24: "Family business 'Black Sheep'"

An in-depth look at the US companies that the bin Laden family does

business with. Even-handed account of companies dealings with the Saudi

bin Laden group.

- New York Post, September 23: "Bin Laden's big family has big ties to

big biz"

More negative in tone. Examines the US companies doing business with the

Baud group. The story says that these companies "have expressed support

for SBG."

- The Baltimore Sun, September 17: "Wealth of bin Laden family can be

seen in Boston area"

Los Angeles Times, September 17: "Boston a home for bin Ladens"

Profiles the connection of the Bin Laden family to Harvard University

and the $2 million dollar endowment.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in