ANALYSIS: Media Watch - Press acknowledges 'Harry Potter' success,with a few gripes

It was two years ago (November 1, 1999) that Media Watch first

wrote about the Harry Potter phenomenon. At that time, the buzz for the

boy wizard's adventures was just gearing up in America. Now, the Warner

Bros. film of the first installment of the series is taking the craze to a whole new level. Whereas two years ago the series had a cult following

which was growing steadily, "media hype (is now) at a frenzied pitch,"

according to The Kansas City Star (November 13).

Previews of the film, which opened at the box office on November 16,

have been very encouraging and noted for being a faithful adaptation of

the book. The Buffalo News (November 13) reported, "No one expects the

film to be anything other than a smash hit." From coast to coast, there

was talk of heavy advance sales for the Harry Potter movie. The Houston

Chronicle (November 12) and others reported that advance ticket sales

have set records at and, two of the leading

online sites for movie tickets.

With such strong sales, a few papers voiced high hopes for a

record-breaking performance for being Warner Bros. best selling movie

ever, outdoing Batman, or for posting the largest ever three-day opening

weekend sales figures, currently held by Jurassic Park 2: The Lost


Two years ago, critics of the Harry Potter fantasy series most

frequently charged that the books promoted witchcraft and that they

should be banned.

This type of criticism is largely gone. Instead, critics are now focused

on the merchandising tie-in that is accompanying the movie's


The Washington Post (November 13) reported that Warner Bros. sold

merchandising rights to 89 different companies, covering the full gamut

of items and trinkets that the youth market would buy: action figures,

clothes, toys, etc. Amazingly, the article also wrote, "But people at

Warner Bros. say the company worked hard not to overwhelm kids with toys

and other licensed things."

Coca-Cola was often singled out for criticism due to its $150

million advertising campaign tied to Harry Potter. The Center for

Science in the Public Interest campaigned against Coke, saying the

company is "taking advantage of kids by using images of Harry Potter to

sell them products that are bad for their health" (The Washington Post,

November 13).

The public didn't seem to buy the line that Warner Bros. had tried to

minimize the amount of merchandising. USA Today (November 14) described

one critic as "repulsed by the tsunami of Potter-related merchandise"

and another who thought that, with their "media onslaught ... media

companies are crowding out children's imaginations."

This, in turn, led to a secondary criticism. There were a handful of

articles that lamented the fact that the books were being made into


Many of these critics were fans who just wished that they would be able

to use their own imagination to envision what Harry Potter's world looks

like, rather than to automatically think of a Hollywood producer's


While Harry Potter will be phenomenally successful, some voices in the

media are suggesting that the over-the-top merchandising campaign is


- Evaluation and analysis by CARMA International. Media Watch can be

found at

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Already registered?
Sign in