Public affairs experts mull over Gordon Brown's interview with Piers Morgan

 
 

12 article comments.

Public affairs experts have been discussing Gordon Brown's appearance on Piers Morgan's chat show last night.

Piers Morgan chat show: Gordon Brown interviewed
Piers Morgan chat show: Gordon Brown interviewed

The Prime Minister appeared on Piers Morgan's Life Stories, during which he talked movingly about his daughter who died and his son's cystic fibrosis.

Brown became visibly upset during the one-hour interview and his wife Sarah, who was also present, cried while he talked about their children.

However, John Major's former press secretary and Hanover founder Charles Lewington was left unconvinced by Brown's performance.

‘Cringe-making, hypocritical and clunky – but it could well add two points to his personal ratings, though not the ratings of the Labour Party. David Cameron should insist that he is never interviewed by Piers Morgan but demand an equally prominent slot from ITV with an interviewer who can convey his core strengths of leadership and common sense.'

Meanwhile DLA Piper head of media and director, trade and government relations, Eben Black said Brown's appearance showed an improvement in the way he presented himself on television.  

‘It was an interview notable, of course, for enormous self-regard and heroic grandstanding. In contrast Gordon Brown came over much better than he ever has before and the obvious aim of making him appear slightly more normal seems to have succeeded.'

He added: ‘He was right to do the interview. But I fear it may be too late to convince the public he is one of them. He managed to avoid answering most of the questions, again a success for him. But there were no tears, unless perhaps I blinked and missed them, which was a victory for spin in itself.'

However, Olly Kendall, head of PR at Insight Public Affairs, said the interview was an ‘unmitigated success'. ‘The interview was utterly engaging because of Brown's candour and visible unease. He came across as honest, passionate and emotionally sensitive. A poll bounce will surely follow.'

He added: ‘But the format is so effective precisely because it's a one-off. His back-story, though, is a great counter-poise to Cameron's decade in media and consultancy, and that is something his PR advisers should look to harness more in the run up to the election.'

Newspaper columnists have also given their verdicts this morning on Brown's interview. The Daily Mail's Quentin Letts said: ‘I suspect Mr Brown will live to regret this appalling show,' while The Times' leading article said the interview ‘eroded the dignity of his office'.

Brown's emotional TV appearance followed Alastair Campbell's interview on the BBC's Andrew Marr show last Sunday, during which Tony Blair's former director of communications struggled to contain his emotions when questioned over the Iraq war.

 

 

 
X

You must log in to use Clip & Save

 
 

All Comments

 
Gemma O'Reilly

Gemma O'Reilly - 15 February 2010

I thought Gordon Brown came across as quite genuine on the show. While some parts made for uncomfortable viewing, I don't think it will do him any harm in the polls. Critics that suggest he should have talked more about politics seem to have missed the point: all he ever does is talk politics and this gave him a chance to talk more personally and dispel criticisms that he is 'cold' and 'dour'.

What's the general consensus?

 
 

Tom Hill - 15 February 2010

Mr Brown has been in high profile positions for decades with no humanity evident. Now we are supposed to swallow this touchy feely PR stunt.

Try another tack.

 
 

Andy Barr - 15 February 2010

I thought he came across better than he has ever done before but at what personal cost?

He can no longer bang the drum about not using his kids to win popularity and his age old adage of concentrating on the job at hand and ignoring spin is also over.

I felt it was a last desperate roll of the dice to try and close the gap on the Conservatives and if I am honest came away feeling it was just a long PPB in favour of Labour.

Andy

 
 
Gemma O'Reilly

Gemma O'Reilly - 15 February 2010

LATEST: apparently Gordon Brown's interview attracted 4.2million viewers last night. Would David Cameron attract as many?

 
 

Kate Orage - 15 February 2010

I thought he did really well, it did make a change to see 'the real' \(sort of) Gordon Brown, and not just listen to him talk politics. It might be too late for him to realise that people like to see that high powered people are actually human, but David Cameron hasn't mastered that either.

I don't think I could relate to David Cameron as much as Brown in many ways. I would probably intend to watch it if he was on it but I wouldn't go out of my way to make sure I didn't miss it

 
 
Tony Watts

Tony Watts - 15 February 2010

Whether we like it or not, the media \(and the public) do want to know the man behind the policies. We've had shedloads about Cameron's children in the past - including carefully arranged photos - and that's been good. I can't say I trust the man because he keeps wobbling about with his policies to try and keep the very distinct wings of his party on side, but the way he was presented as a caring \(then bereaved) father of a disabled child certainly made me feel more positively about him. And I can't believe he didn't have someone advising him on how to present all of that, so let's not hear any more about spin - puhleeze. They all do it.

I think Brown's problem is that he not a naturally outgoing person, and when he does stuff like smile he scares people; when he emotes, it comes out all wrong. His best bet for the election has to be convincing the public that he is a safe pair of hands with the economy. Cameron is not over the line yet.

 
 

Jonathan Sheppard - 15 February 2010

Gemma - you hit the nail on the head. Would David Cameron have attracted 4.2 million? We won't know as is Cameron or Clegg being given the chance to be interview by a personal friend to talk about their lives?

Are we to believe the audience wasn't full of "supporters" when we hear cheers at the end of the show. They may as well have said it was a PEB on behalf of the Labour party.

 
 
Edward Staite

Edward Staite - 15 February 2010

A key tactic in a crisis situation is to show humility, even emotion, to break down barriers between you and your customers or external stakeholders. What Brown has done is a simple tactic to bridge to his target audience. However, he has been in this crisis situation for so long now that he will fail to change people's perceptions. As this has been labelled as a 'PR trick' it may even do him more harm than good.

 
 
AgentsForChange

AgentsForChange - 15 February 2010

I think in public affairs people need face time with a leader. If you look how Obama engages with the media you shall see this is a good move.

The history of Piers Morgan is a differerent matter. If you are familar with the commentariat \(Morgans old playmates) they have always courted the attention of Westminister policians. Just hope it does not mark a return to duming down of Tony Blair seemed to love or any sort of favouritism. I would lke a spot on there some time.

Gemma your comment is poignant. Would Cameron have even got on, is he fostering media links that Millbank is so good at.

 
 

Angus Barcroft - 15 February 2010

I agree with Tom! A week after we see Alistair Campbell blubbering on the Andrew Marr show \(another high profile person with little or no humanity) we have Brown displaying his emotions \(albeit for different reasons) on live TV!

It certainly won't amend all the mistakes he has made!

 
 

Danny Rogers - 16 February 2010

I think the programme reached voters that the usual political comms channels could not - and that it was a triumph for Brown in softening his image. You can be pretty sure that Team Cameron is pushing hard to pull off something similar that would help jettison his 'toff' image.

Whether it is simply too late for Brown and Labour is another issue. I think it probably is.

 
 

Max Atkinson - 16 February 2010

The point is that, given his low ratings, he really didn't have anything to lose, just as Mrs Thatcher had everything to gain when she went on Michael Aspel's chat show in 1983 \(http://bit.ly/aaOwVV).

He benefited from the editing, which buried the most contentious stuff in the the middle of the show. A case of good luck or careful collusion, I wonder? http://bit.ly/cBwtns

 
 

Comments

 
 

To post comments please log in here

 
 
 

PRWeek Agency Showcase

 

Bulletins

You can sign up for our bulletins. Select bulletins you are interested in, enter your email adress an click the button below

Preview
Preview
Preview
 

Poll

Is it OK for journalists/bloggers to name and shame persistent PR professionals?

 

View Results