Amanda Andrews
Amanda Andrews, marketingmagazine.co.uk, Tuesday, 13 October 2009, 8:30am,
Amanda Andrews
When the Evening Standard announced plans to become a freesheet, News Corporation's chief, James Murdoch, was most likely sitting in his walled world of Wapping wondering why anyone would take such a gamble.
He had tried the London freesheet model and failed, announcing just weeks earlier that thelondonpaper would close. The publication had reported a pre-tax loss of £12.91m in the year to 29 June 2008 on turnover of £14.1m.
Murdoch Jr would have had every right to be puzzled. The evening freesheet business model as it currently stands is not exactly lucrative.
I was sceptical when I heard Russian oligarch Alexander Lebedev's latest news, as I sat on a train with the daily freesheet Metro in hand. After all, the buzzword these days is ‘pay walls'. Just ask Rupert Murdoch, Sir Martin Sorrell and most of the world's key media gurus.
Sacrificing £12m of cover price revenue and increasing costs by more than doubling circulation initially seems a recipe for disaster. Yet having sat back, spoken to industry experts and extracted more gossip on what the Lebedev camp was thinking, it begins to make more sense.
The switch is a gamble, but it is a risk worth taking when one considers that, in August, just 107,680 copies of the Evening Standard a day were being sold at full price. Such miserable circulation revenues are worth sacrificing for the additional ad revenues that increasing circulation to 600,000-plus will bring. Ad prices can feasibly be increased by 50% on this rise in circulation.
As long as the newspaper keeps its quality and Lebedev does not slash scores of jobs, the free Standard stands a chance. Job cuts are reportedly intended, but it is crucial that Lebedev does not lose sight of his original agenda for the 182-year-old title - to create an upmarket evening read focused on London events, arts and culture - if he wants to create an attractive proposition for advertisers.
However, the Standard's best chance of success is centred on selecting a new distribution model. The evening freesheet should expand its focus beyond the commuter. Househusbands and housewives in affluent suburbs must also be targeted, as they often make family buying decisions and are a key target for advertisers.
The Evening Standard is rumoured to be in talks with retailers, such as WH Smith, to distribute the title in the high streets of the posher London suburbs, but there is a wealth of other possible distribution channels. A copy could accompany your Ocado or Amazon delivery, or be available when you visit Starbucks or Marks & Spencer.
The quality of the paid-for edition must be accompanied by equal quality of distribution. Holding onto the old vendors, some of whom have been in their jobs for 50 years, is key. These people are part of the Standard's identity and personality. Customers must also be handed a paper at store check-outs; leaving the title to be picked up from a bucket is not good enough.
Another reason for having distribution channels in suburban locations is to get copies into the home, to be read by the whole family.
With an instant circulation rise to 600,000 and possible further increases if the suburban model proves popular, the free Standard should be a more interesting proposition for advertisers than the paid-for model. However, it must ensure that effective distribution channels are in place, and that this move is not viewed by Lebedev simply as an opportunity to slash costs.
Amanda Andrews is media editor at The Daily Telegraph, Sunday Telegraph and telegraph.co.uk
This article was first published on marketingmagazine.co.uk



