Because you're not worth it: L'Oreal found guilty of racism
James Quilter, brandrepublic.com, Thursday, 25 June 2009, 9:40am,
LONDON - Cosmetics giant L'Oreal, which was last year accused of whitening Beyonce Knowles' skin in an ad, has been found guilty of racial discrimination by a French court over its all-white recruitment policy for its shampoo sales teams.
La Cour de Cassation, the French supreme court, heard that in 2000, Garnier, L'Oreal's beauty division, was looking to recruit a sales team for the Fructis Style haircare range.
When the brief went out, one of the requisites was that staff should be "BBR", an acronym for the colours of the French flag and widely used to signify someone who is white and of French descent. It also wanted the women sized between 8 and 12.
The case was brought by anti-racist group SOS Racisme after it was discovered that only 4.65% of sales staff hired were black, Asian or Arab despite those groups covering 38.7% of potential candidates.
L'Oreal and recruitment consultancy Adecco, which handled the recruitment drive, has been fined £25,500 each and ordered to pay the same amount again to SOS Racisme.
L'Oreal expressed "disappointment" over the verdict while Adecco insisted the company had been looking for candidates who "could express themselves in French." Adecco also said the brief to hire BBR candidates was a personal initiative rather than company policy.
The case is the latest embarrassment for L'Oreal over its attitude towards race. Last year it came under scrutiny over allegations it had whitened Beyonce Knowles' skin in an ad, a claim it was forced to deny.
While in India, actress and L'Oreal brand ambassador Aishwarya Rai, who starred in 'Bride and Prejudice', refused a request from the manufacturer to appear in a campaign for a skin whitening cream.
The L'Oreal discrimination case ends as another featuring fashion retailer Abercrombie & Fitch is about to start. A former employee with a prosthetic arm who claims she was forced to work in the storeroom because she did not fit in with the company's "looks policy" is taking the store to an employment tribunal.
Law student Riam Dean is seeking £25,000 in compensation. She said Abercrombie's policy made her question her "worth as a human being".
However the store claimed Dean's problems stemmed from anxiety issues rather than Abercrombie's personnel policy.
This article was first published on brandrepublic.com
Share this story
Related Links
Additional Information
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
-
Associate Director - Consumer Health and Fitness
Reuben Sinclair
up to £70k, pus benefits - personalised training programme, healthcare, early finish fridays..., Central London -
PR Manager
BOC Group
Competitive salary and benefits , Guildford Surrey -
Business Development Manager - Public Relations
PR Futures
£30-£40k+package, London -
Head of campaigns - PR
Samsung
Competitive Salary + Bonus + Benefits, South East region -
Head of B2B PR
Samsung
Competitive Salary + Bonus + Benefits, South East region

Most read
- George Pitcher sets out plans for Jericho Chambers to overcome 'redundant' PR model
- Sony to split consumer electronics PR brief in two putting Cake on alert
- The real influencers in Westminster outnumber lobbyists
- Albion Drive picks up six-figure brief for Nominet Trust
- NHS ratchets up role of PR to refocus on service's reputation
- GolinHarris snaps up Lewis PR's Elizabeth Littlewood to lead tech practice
Most commented





