TUPE ruling puts industry on alert
Clare O'Connor, PR Week UK, Wednesday, 04 July 2007, 7:11pm,
An employment tribunal has fired a ‘legal warning shot' at the PR industry by ruling that agency PROs have the right to transfer to a rival firm following a client re-tender.
The tribunal ruled that Karis Hunt, a former account manager at Storm Communications, had the right to follow her client, Brown Brothers Wines, to a different agency.
The precedent-setting case saw Hunt win an unfair dismissal claim in a first instance tribunal under the recently amended Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) regulations, commonly known as TUPE.
Hunt was made redundant from Storm when Brown Brothers Wines – her biggest client – stopped using the agency and turned instead to Wild Card PR, following a competitive pitch.
Under TUPE, if a PRO’s principal purpose at an agency is to serve one particular client, he or she is automatically entitled to continue employment with another agency, should another agency. In this case, ‘principal purpose’ is defined as spending 52% of her time on the client.
Bob Mecrate-Butcher, partner at employment law firm Pinsent Masons, said the landmark case was ‘big news for the PR profession’. He added: ‘The kicker is for the client. This undermines their decision to re-tender, which is ultimately to have new blood on an account.’
Employment law firms are adapting in anticipation of an increase in TUPE cases in the PR, marketing and advertising industries. Mecrate-Butcher warned that PR agencies may consider spreading more of their employees across the business.
Patrick Barrow, MD at the PRCA, said: ‘This is a legal warning shot for the industry.’ However, he added that there was a danger of similar cases ‘collapsing under the weight of legal argument’.
There will be a further hearing at the end of the summer to decide the extent of Hunt’s financial compensation, according to David Grey-Jones, solicitor at law firm Thomas Mansfield, who is representing Hunt.
Brown Brothers Wines shifted its PR account to Wild Card in August last year.
WHAT TUPE MEANS
Implications for agencies...
- If an agency wins a new client, it could be forced to hire staff from the client’s previous retained agency.
- A TUPE claim relies on a PRO serving one ‘principal’ client
Implications for clients...
- Despite a re-tender, a client may find the same team PROs working on an account
The CIPR has created guidelines on employment to take into account the implications of TUPE. Download them at www.cipr.co.uk/research
Share this story
Related Links
Additional Information
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
-
Associate Director - Consumer Health and Fitness
Reuben Sinclair
up to £70k, pus benefits - personalised training programme, healthcare, early finish fridays..., Central London -
PR Manager
BOC Group
Competitive salary and benefits , Guildford Surrey -
Business Development Manager - Public Relations
PR Futures
£30-£40k+package, London -
Head of campaigns - PR
Samsung
Competitive Salary + Bonus + Benefits, South East region -
Head of B2B PR
Samsung
Competitive Salary + Bonus + Benefits, South East region

Most read
- George Pitcher sets out plans for Jericho Chambers to overcome 'redundant' PR model
- Sony to split consumer electronics PR brief in two putting Cake on alert
- The real influencers in Westminster outnumber lobbyists
- Albion Drive picks up six-figure brief for Nominet Trust
- NHS ratchets up role of PR to refocus on service's reputation
- GolinHarris snaps up Lewis PR's Elizabeth Littlewood to lead tech practice
Most commented





