MEDIA: FORUM; Do clients resent the lack of senior staff contact?
RICHARD COOK, Campaign, Friday, 30 August 1996, 12:00am,
Optimedia’s managing director, Simon Mathews, made a bid to stand out from the pack last week by allocating more senior staff to work on clients’ business day-to-day. Clients, he says, are being short-changed by the majority of agencies, who leave junior staff to do most of the work. Richard Cook investigates
Optimedia’s managing director, Simon Mathews, made a bid to stand out
from the pack last week by allocating more senior staff to work on
clients’ business day-to-day. Clients, he says, are being short-changed
by the majority of agencies, who leave junior staff to do most of the
work. Richard Cook investigates
When Optimedia parted company with four senior executives last week,
there were none of the customary apologies about the depth of the
recession, no fashionable rationalisation about changes throughout the
company. This move, we were led to believe by the recently appointed
managing director, Simon Mathews, was deliberately designed to
create a point of difference from other agencies. It was designed to
streamline management and bring the senior people into closer contact
with clients.
Clients were being fobbed-off with junior staff, according to Mathews,
and it was now time to deliver on the promises made by the heavyweight
pitch team, for whom actually winning the business all too often marks
the beginning of the end of their involvement.
Unfortunately, clients can certainly empathise with that situation, even
if it’s not their immediate experience, as John Blakemore, the UK
advertising director at SmithKline Beecham, explains: ‘I’m sure there
are a great many occasions when the client feels short-changed, where
the reality doesn’t live up to the expectations raised by the top-flight
pitch team. You hear about such cases with regularity. But, of course,
what no individual client ever really knows is whether this happens in
10 per cent or 90 per cent of cases.
‘The problem wouldn’t matter too much if there were uniform standards of
talent throughout an agency, but too often that is simply not the case.
You still hear instances of people finding out that the team working on
their account is simply not of the required calibre.’
Dominic Owens, Mercury’s marketing services manager, believes that
establishing good links with the senior agency staff who will look after
your business should play an important part in the whole pitch process.
And there are a number of commonsense pointers for clients to watch out
for. ‘When choosing an agency there is a delicate balance to be achieved
- you don’t want one with too many clients because then you fear that
you won’t get the attention of the most senior people. Yet, on the other
hand, you need a buying point of a certain size to be able to buy well,’
he explains.
‘I’ve always worked on accounts that require a great deal of media
planning. The big, centralised accounts for which the buying is
everything might not be too concerned about being attended to by
relatively junior people.
‘You can never have too senior a person on your business - providing
they still know their stuff and are not just a luncher - because you
need some perspective on your business, you need someone who can look at
an apparently new idea and say ‘no, that didn’t work when it was last
tried’. ’
For agencies, the problem is that the more successful they become the
more business they attract and the less likely it is that the people
attracting the business are able to deal with it personally. Agencies
such as PHD and Manning Gottlieb Media initially made a virtue of the
fact that partners would look after the business. The MGM partner, Nick
Manning, says: ‘Price is becoming less of a discriminating factor
between media agencies as the discounts secured by the bigger buying
points draw closer to each other.
‘The real edge now comes from the heightened visibility produced by the
intelligent use of a range of traditional and new media channels, the
way they’re used and how they combine to multiply each other.’
Achieving this effect is precisely where top talent makes a difference.
MGM can still offer a director working full-time on all accounts, but
concedes that the challenge is how to recruit successfully and manage
expansion.
‘Crucially,’ Manning says, ‘we have set in motion a policy of recruiting
senior personnel as both generators of ideas and the people who carry
them through, while the direct involvement of the partners has also been
helped by out-sourcing our finance function.’
CIA Medianetwork’s managing director, Mike Tunnicliffe, agrees that this
problem is proving to be a major headache: ‘It’s an issue that seems to
come up more and more. And it’s not just a problem for companies as they
expand and take on more business. The good people in agencies, the ones
that are good with clients, often end up running the businesses and can
get bogged down in the day-to-day admin, rather than working with
clients.
‘All media companies should make sure that good senior people have
enough time to deal with clients. Here, me and my deputy, Marco Rimini,
have specific client responsibilities and both of us deal directly on
three or four key accounts. For our big clients we set up a strategic
team with three senior people who get involved at crucial times in the
client’s year.
‘You’ve got to do something like that. If you want to offer just a
buying service then you can have one or two top people skirt across all
the accounts, but today more and more clients just take buying as a
given and really want to know what else you can offer. And that means
the enhanced planning and account management skills that tend to be the
preserve of senior staff.’
According to John Hooper, the director general of the Incorporated
Society of British Advertisers, whatever the answer it must ensure that
standards do not drop too alarmingly low down the management chain.
‘The moves at Optimedia are interesting and do look as though they were
brought about by client pressure. It does concern clients when they see
the senior management spending time on going out and grabbing new
business or dealing with the City. All advertisers, in an ideal world,
would like to deal just with the top players, but there simply aren’t
enough of them to go round.
‘If you’re a big player then you can demand top people for your account,
but if you’re a client spending pounds 1 million a year then your
bargaining power is reduced. What is the most important thing of all is
that agencies have really talented and well-trained people in junior
positions who can work on your business without a drop in standards.’
This article was first published on Campaign
Share this story
Additional Information
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
-
Online PR Manager- Exciting Online Content Marketing Co- up to £45,000
Cedar Scott
Up to £45,000 per annum, Central London -
In-house Internal Communications Manager (Kent)
6 Degrees Talent Ltd
£75,000 per annum + £8k car allowance and 25 days holiday, Kent, South East Region -
Property PR & marketing Account Manager
Halogen
£32,500 - £37,500, Central London -
Senior Account Director - Consumer Health
PR Futures
£55-£65k+package + bonus, London -
Director of Media Relations
British Bankers' Association
Competitive Salary + benefits, City of London
Most read
- PR agencies claw back digital business from specialist shops
- National Lottery in £250,000 PR hunt to reconnect with public
- Microsoft kicks off six-figure b2b comms pitch
- Westminster Advisers shakes up staff line-up following review
- South Africa seeks digital help to combat 'negative perceptions'
- Hope&Glory wins Ikea consumer press office duties
Most commented





