MEDIA: FORUM; Who should worry if Carlton buys Cinema Media?
ALASDAIR REID, Campaign, Friday, 14 June 1996, 12:00am,
Carlton Communications has its eyes on Cinema Media, the leading cinema ad sales operation. What are the implications for the cinema medium as a whole? What do agencies and advertisers think? And is there a danger Carlton would be tempted to abuse its virtual monopoly in cinema advertising? Alasdair Reid reports
Carlton Communications has its eyes on Cinema Media, the leading cinema
ad sales operation. What are the implications for the cinema medium as a
whole? What do agencies and advertisers think? And is there a danger
Carlton would be tempted to abuse its virtual monopoly in cinema
advertising? Alasdair Reid reports
Carlton has always been at the cutting-edge of the audio-visual
industries. It is a 21st-century company, right down to the way it runs
its ITV franchises. It is involved in all aspects of video production,
from facilities houses to home video distribution. In addition, through
its ownership of SelecTV, it is at the forefront of the cable business.
And you can bet that when interactive TV becomes viable, Carlton will be
one of the players.
That is why it is slightly surprising to see the company trying to buy
into a 19th-century technology. Cinema, as the industry itself keeps
reminding us, is 100 years old this year. Cinema Media might be slightly
younger than this but, in its various incarnations, it goes back to the
days of the immortal J. Arthur Rank and films that were introduced by an
immodestly dressed body-builder bashing a big gong.
Last week, it emerged that Carlton was in negotiations to buy Cinema
Media (Campaign, 7 June) - although, in time-honoured fashion, it would
make no official comment on its intentions.
So what is Carlton up to? Not only is cinema a very old medium, it is
also a small one. Cinema Media may have 80 per cent of the UK market,
but the medium only takes 1 per cent of national display ad revenue.
One Carlton insider points out that the move would effectively turn the
Carlton ITV franchise from a five-day into a seven-day operation. The
size and quality of the audience attracted by London’s cinemas on Friday
and Saturday nights compares favourably with the television audience
pulled in by LWT.
Should this please, or worry, advertisers? Cinema Media has a very
powerful position in its markets and agencies report that it often tries
to sell on a conditional basis, giving big discounts for solus use.
Support from Carlton would give it the confidence to use that position
even more effectively. And wouldn’t Carlton’s TV clients come under
pressure to use cinema more often? In any case, would that be a bad
thing?
Peter Howard-Williams, the managing director of Cinema Media’s only real
rival, Pearl and Dean, is less than happy about the situation. ‘There is
a potential upside to Carlton’s involvement. An organisation of that
size and power can attract the advertisers cinema has failed to win over
in the past few years,’ he concedes. ‘The obvious downside is that we at
Pearl and Dean have been on the wrong end of a David and Goliath
situation. Advertisers are offered big incentives not to use us, but we
have fought hard - and successfully - to combat conditional selling. Now
it will be a case of David versus Goliath and his very large friend,
Michael Green [the chairman of Carlton].’
Howard-Williams says that, if a Carlton takeover of Cinema Media
radically changes the market conditions, he will immediately approach
the Office of Fair Trading. ‘There are precedents for this. Capital
Radio, for instance, had its knuckles rapped for its sales practices in
the London market. We will not just sit around and watch our business
disappear. And we would also expect the Institute of Practitioners in
Advertising and the Incorporated Society of British Advertisers to have
strong views about this. They have to make their concerns clear, or else
where is it going to end?’ he asks.
But the IPA may not be prepared to ride to Pearl and Dean’s rescue. Nick
Phillips, the director general of the IPA, is inclined to sit on the
fence: ‘My initial view is that Cinema Media already has a very big
percentage of the cinema market and, for that reason, we have to be very
careful in our relationship with it. We have had discussions with the
company recently concerning its attempts to introduce a levy on the
reproduction of film prints and I’m glad to say that it has withdrawn
those proposals. Now we are having discussions about its intention to
introduce a late copy surcharge.
‘Our initial view is that someone coming in as a new owner doesn’t
necessarily change the extent of Cinema Media’s monopoly powers. It
would depend entirely on how that new owner behaved. If conditional
selling became a problem, then we would have to consider our position. I
don’t see why that should necessarily happen just because the new owners
were Carlton.’
Robert Ray, the deputy managing director of the Media Centre, is not
prepared to be so even-handed. He argues that Cinema Media should have
been monitored more carefully than it has been. After all, agencies took
on Capital for similarly monopolistic practices. ‘For some advertisers,
cinema will always be an important part of their marketing strategy, but
for others, such as fmcg advertisers, it is just icing on the cake,’ he
points out. ‘But even the advertisers who use it to target younger
audiences have other opportunities these days - such as radio and
satellite television.
‘Carlton has obviously taken note of the fact that Cinema Media is a
profitable operation and doubtless it believes that it can extract even
more from the business. But I have to say right now that, if there is
even the slightest whiff of conditional selling or artificial rate
hardening, advertisers will have no hesitation in pulling their
budgets.’
Lorna Tilbian, a media analyst at Panmure Gordon, doesn’t believe the
OFT will have much sympathy with Pearl and Dean. ‘If it is OK for Cinema
Media to have 80 per cent of the market now, why shouldn’t it be OK for
Carlton to have 80 per cent? At the moment, Carlton has no exposure to
the medium whatsoever,’ she points out. ‘Let’s face it, Carlton’s one
third share of the TV market is significant - 80 per cent of less than
1 per cent of display advertising revenue is neither here nor there.
‘Cinema Media is a good prospect, though. The medium’s performance is
linked to audience figures and they are the highest they have been for
30 years. I take my hat off to Michael Green. Carlton currently has the
fastest earnings growth of any media company on the FTSE.’
This article was first published on Campaign
Share this story
Additional Information
Latest jobs Jobs web feed
-
Online PR Manager- Exciting Online Content Marketing Co- up to £45,000
Cedar Scott
Up to £45,000 per annum, Central London -
In-House Retail Brand - Internal Communication Manager
6 Degrees Talent Ltd
c£55k, Milton Keynes -
Property PR & marketing Account Manager
Halogen
£32,500 - £37,500, Central London -
Senior Account Director - Consumer Health
PR Futures
£55-£65k+package + bonus, London -
Director of Media Relations
British Bankers' Association
Competitive Salary + benefits, City of London
Most read
- NHS leaders and chief executives encouraged to communicate online
- Google 'on front foot' with Eric Schmidt column on tax issue
- In-house and agency heads review unpaid intern policies following campaign
- Virgin Galactic in talks with PR agencies to promote spaceflights
- Qatar Airways launches agency review
- Exposure's Simon Shaw launches Good Relations' content arm
Most commented





