This Week’s Big Question: Can restrictive covenants stop staff taking clients when they go? - Four board members quit Shandwick last week to form the Hogarth Partnership

JANET EDMOND

JANET EDMOND



Ethical Strategies



’Yes they are a deterrent. However, where the relationship between a

client and the individual consultant is particularly strong, these

issues need to be worked through. Restrictive covenants can be amended

so that all three parties - client, agency and individual - can reach an

amicable agreement. It reflects the importance of honesty and trust

between senior consultants and managers at the agency.’



JILL COOMBER



Grant Butler Coomber



’They are deterrents in messy situations because of the time and cost

involved in dealing with a court injunction. In your set-up phase you

should be focusing on the quality of the new company instead of fighting

in court. However, if you’re good, new clients will come on board

regardless.



You don’t need to take your old clients with you to be successful

quickly.’



JANE HOWARD



Leedex Public Relations



’It depends entirely on how contracts are drafted and there is no one

way of doing this. What tends to happen is that the broader the

covenant, the less applicable it is. You have to be realistic and a lot

depends on the client relationship. Generally, agencies are unwilling to

upset big, well-resourced companies. It’s not a question of morality,

it’s a question of law.’



PAUL TAAFFE



Hill and Knowlton



’No, but they’re the only deterrent that one has. They’re only effective

when legally sound, tending to be either too understated to be of any

use or too overstated to stand up legally. The real issue is the

attitude of the employer. If it is prepared to pursue the case

vigorously it may not gain, but it does send out a powerful message.

Once lawyers reach for their guns it’s usually too late for both sides.

Their real value is enabling both sides to negotiate a compromise.’



KATE BRITTIN



Employment solicitor at Lewis Silkin



’Non-solicitation covenants are so difficult to prove that they’re not

very helpful. Unless the individual admits soliciting, that information

has to come from the client, and agencies are usually unwilling to get

into battles with clients. But non-dealing covenants - where an

individual cannot act for a client - can be a good deterrent as an

individual will usually have fewer resources than the agency and fear

the expense of fighting an injunction.’



Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

John Lewis to tell brand story with "tasteful" 150th anniversary celebrations

John Lewis to tell brand story with "tasteful" 150th anniversary celebrations

Department store John Lewis is to use its 150th anniversary this year to talk about its history, which "not enough people know about", according to director of communications Peter Cross.

Labour hires Obama election strategist David Axelrod to fight General Election

Labour hires Obama election strategist David Axelrod to fight General Election

The man who helped Barack Obama win the 2008 and 2012 US presidential elections is to work for Labour along with members of his team.

Sky adds Fever PR to its roster after splitting with Cake

Sky adds Fever PR to its roster after splitting with Cake

Pay-TV giant Sky has added Fever PR to its agency line-up for a wide-ranging brief covering products and services.

Max Clifford trial jury to continue deliberations after Easter break

Max Clifford trial jury to continue deliberations after Easter break

The jury in the trial of celebrity publicist Max Clifford has been sent home for Easter and will reconvene on Tuesday for further deliberations about its verdicts on 11 charges of indecent assault.

Home Office brings in Munro & Forster to campaign against FGM

Home Office brings in Munro & Forster to campaign against FGM

The Home Office has tasked Munro & Forster (M&F) with supporting its campaign to eradicate female genital mutilation (FGM) as part of a wider retained brief.