THIS WEEK’S BIG QUESTION: Who do you trust in the GM foods debate?

Confusion surrounds the issue of the safety of genetically modified foods

Confusion surrounds the issue of the safety of genetically modified

foods



Martin Paterson



Food and Drink Federation



’I think that people will trust their instincts and take the same common

sense approach which they did over beef on the bone. This so-called

debate is more about politics than about food safety. The food and drink

industry is far from complacent, but carelines and sales figures show

that real consumers - as opposed to consumerists - are shrugging off the

irresponsible and overblown scaremongering headlines.’



Charlene Bargeron



Greenlines Healthcare Communications



’Probably no one. The experts don’t know, the politicians lack unbiased

advisers and industry only cares about shareholder value.People’s

comments are only as good as the accuracy of their information, filtered

through their prejudices and other influences.’



Richard Harrison



Greenwood Tighe PR



’The fear surrounding GM food is about consumer confidence. As ’experts’

continue to make claim and counter claim I doubt the public will trust

the boffins. People are becoming sceptical of the biotech food

companies.



Public opinion is with green groups like Friends of the Earth and

English Nature and the Government should listen to regain trust.’



Jack Cunningham



Minister for the Cabinet Office



’The Government trusts independent expert scientists. Genetic

modification is a fast moving area of science. The Government’s first

priority is to protect consumers and the environment. We are proceeding

with caution to ensure that this priority is achieved. We take advice

from the best expert scientists who are independent from Government. We

also believe in having a broader public debate about the use of genetic

technology. So we also listen carefully to the views of the public

before taking decisions.’



George Monbiot



Environmental campaigner



’The problem is that no one understands the whole subject. The

scientists understand some of the science, but not the politics and

economics. The politicians understand some of the political issues, but

not the science.



The corporations understand how to force the world to grow and eat their

crops, but don’t understand why everyone else thinks this is a bad

idea.



We can trust them all -to get just about everything wrong.’



Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

Max Clifford trial jury to reconvene tomorrow after majority verdicts direction

Max Clifford trial jury to reconvene tomorrow after majority verdicts direction

The jury in the trial of celebrity publicist Max Clifford on 11 charges of indecent assault has been sent home for the day after being told by the judge earlier this afternoon that he will now accept majority verdicts.

Labour "fooling themselves" over plans to combat attacks on Miliband

Labour "fooling themselves" over plans to combat attacks on Miliband

Conservative-leaning public affairs experts have questioned the value of Labour's adoption of US-style campaigning tactics in the wake of the opposition hiring election strategist David Axelrod.

PLMR appoints Professor Tim Morris as non-executive director

The vet who helped establish the British Horseracing Authority's anti-doping and animal welfare programme has joined PLMR as a non-executive director.