Neil Martinson: Impact of bought, owned and earned media in advertising

Something is changing in advertising. The old one-way model of TV and posters with the creatives seeking the perfect 30 second and 48 sheet ad is in decline.

Neil Martinson
Neil Martinson

Driven by the impact of digital, and questions about the efficacy and costs of traditional advertising, a new concept of bought, owned and earned media is now entering the fray. The pitch being made is that social networks are a new space where the client has to earn the right to be present. This then feeds into communications strategy and, inevitably, the buying decisions.

But is this new and what does "owned and earned media" mean? The channels may be changing but it's about engagement and conversations.  

PR has always been about earning our space. This may be in media channels that are as diverse as consumers, or moving from opinion formers to opinion shapers. From mums to Ministers, and teenagers to the third age, third party or peer endorsement has always been a valuable commodity to influence and persuade so as to change attitudes and behaviours. To do that we've had to develop strategies, narratives, content, tone of voice and language. The challenge is moving from influencing the few (editorial) to influence the many (readers and viewers) where the dialogue is immediately many on many but the skills of influencing are at the heart of it.

In helping organisations with their reputation, we've also been obsessed, and sometimes frustrated, in seeking an alignment of what organisations do (bought), what they say (owned) and what others say about them (earnt). That can mean challenging the policy to prevent adverse responses and that's rather more productive than chasing down a story that has gone hopelessly wrong whether on or offline.

The CIPR definition of PR is worth recalling as the discipline that has "the aim of earning understanding and support and influencing opinion and behaviour."

Smart marketers and communicators have always looked at the mix in relation to the objective.  Television is still the only medium that can provoke and sustain a national conversation, so it's a mistake to get into false, polarised choices that are not supported by the evidence.

But the advertising industry is right in recognising that a completely different skill set is required to come to terms with social networking. Let's welcome them to public relations and raise our game to make sure we are at the heart of strategy and planning.


Neil Martinson is director of news and PR at the COI

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

Max Clifford trial jury to reconvene tomorrow after majority verdicts direction

Max Clifford trial jury to reconvene tomorrow after majority verdicts direction

The jury in the trial of celebrity publicist Max Clifford on 11 charges of indecent assault has been sent home for the day after being told by the judge earlier this afternoon that he will now accept majority verdicts.

Labour "fooling themselves" over plans to combat attacks on Miliband

Labour "fooling themselves" over plans to combat attacks on Miliband

Conservative-leaning public affairs experts have questioned the value of Labour's adoption of US-style campaigning tactics in the wake of the opposition hiring election strategist David Axelrod.

PLMR appoints Professor Tim Morris as non-executive director

The vet who helped establish the British Horseracing Authority's anti-doping and animal welfare programme has joined PLMR as a non-executive director.