BIG QUESTION: Is a food safety officer the best way to restore public confidence?

The Government is to appoint a food safety expert in the wake of recent food scares.

The Government is to appoint a food safety expert in the wake of

recent food scares.



Lee Tomkins



Ruder Finn



’It would provide a focus for concerns about food safety and give the

general public a feeling that there was an independent review process in

place to deal with issues promptly. At the moment the public is wavering

and doesn’t know what to think. Of course it would have to be someone of

considerable standing and experience but if, like the chief medical

officer, they can remain above political bias, there’s no reason why the

public shouldn’t develop confidence in the process in the long

term.’



Jonathan Choat



Cameron Choat and Partners



’It’s a good move, but it won’t stop the self-appointed representatives

of food safety desperately trying to make their opinions heard. What

they and sections of the media concentrate on is the hazard rather than

the real risk, which is very small. If an independent expert can put

that risk into context and is backed up by strong scientific evidence,

then I think the public can have some faith.’



Matt Tee



Guy’s and St Thomas’ Hospital Trust



’In terms of public relations I think the answer is no. The food

industry is so disparate that I think it’s unlikely an inspector will

have the scope and teeth to get to grips with the issue. Also, if you

have the same Ministry in charge of food safety and farmers, can any

inspector be seen to be impartial? The problem is credibility. No-one

believes the government has the power to control the problem and setting

up an inspectorate won’t change that.’



Colin Doeg



Author of Crisis Management in the Food and Drinks Industry



’This is mere electioneering. The creation of a strong, independent food

agency like the FDA in the US but more in tune with European food

regimes would do more to restore public confidence in the Government and

the food industry. Such a drastic solution is necessary because the

integrity of food manufacturers and suppliers and their commitment to

consumers and the production of safe, wholesome foods is not generally

appreciated.



Nor is the difficulty of conveying complicated scientific matters in

simple, comprehensible terms which do not cause unnecessary alarm. It is

all too easy for information to be exploited out of context by pressure

groups and others with vested interests.’



Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

Max Clifford trial jury to reconvene tomorrow after majority verdicts direction

Max Clifford trial jury to reconvene tomorrow after majority verdicts direction

The jury in the trial of celebrity publicist Max Clifford on 11 charges of indecent assault has been sent home for the day after being told by the judge earlier this afternoon that he will now accept majority verdicts.

Labour "fooling themselves" over plans to combat attacks on Miliband

Labour "fooling themselves" over plans to combat attacks on Miliband

Conservative-leaning public affairs experts have questioned the value of Labour's adoption of US-style campaigning tactics in the wake of the opposition hiring election strategist David Axelrod.

PLMR appoints Professor Tim Morris as non-executive director

The vet who helped establish the British Horseracing Authority's anti-doping and animal welfare programme has joined PLMR as a non-executive director.