WHAT THE PAPERS SAY: Govt criticised for nuclear ambition

Tony Blair found himself at the epicentre of a nuclear fallout last week after the High Court ruled that the Government's consultation on the next generation of power stations was flawed.

Aided by Greenpeace and the Opposition, headlines were embarrassing and damaging to Blair, who is in his last months as Prime Minister: ‘Court blow to nuke plans' (www.sky.com, 15 February); ‘Greenpeace defeats government on nuclear power' (www.politics.co.uk, 15 February).

Deemed procedurally unfair and lacking information on the full economic and environmental costs of nu­­c­lear power, the consultation was variously dismissed as a PR exercise, an illegal sham, and a product of Blair's style of ‘sofa government' (Daily Mail, 15 February).

‘Tony Blair had already decided what he wanted to do and the consultation was created to fit the policy,' claimed the Sunday Herald (18 Feb).

But despite the media meltdown over procedure, the arguments in favour of nuclear power shone through. A low-carbon fuel, it was positioned as key in reducing the UK's carbon emissions and maintaining a secure energy source.

It seems that Greenpeace may have won this battle but could be losing the war.

Analysis conducted by Echo Research from data supplied to PRWeek from NewsNow.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in

Would you like to post a comment?

Please Sign in or register.