Beyond censorship in Chinese social media

When I got my hands on a copy of PR Magazine, published by the China International Public Relations Association, I realized half the content was about Chinese social media, particularly microblogging website Sina Weibo.

When I got my hands on a copy of PR Magazine, published by the China International Public Relations Association, I realized half the content was about Chinese social media, particularly microblogging website Sina Weibo.

It should come as no surprise that social media has become of one of the sharpest swords for the PR industry right now. But while the importance of social media to the PR industry in America has been much discussed, Chinese social media must be approached with more caution.

Chinese social media websites started to gain traction a few years later than those in America. Nonetheless, they have quickly changed the face of Chinese media and communication, which was formerly dominated by traditional forms of media. But while American TV stations and the publishing industry blame the Internet for stealing their business, the similar shift in Chinese media and communication has a far more significant and positive connotation for the general public.

Traditional Chinese news media has a long history of heavy censorship and government restriction. Leading news agencies and newspapers such as Xin Hua, China Comment are state-owned and burdened by the party's agenda. China's grip on non-Mainland-Chinese press from Hong Kong or the West is less firm. David Brain, president and CEO of Edelman Asia-Pacific, says “China's social media landscape is a more closely regulated environment, with government measures in place to monitor and, in some situations, censor online discussions.” But although Chinese social media has inherited this tradition of censorship, it is much less effective due to the sheer amount of information and speed of dissemination on the Internet. Much news would not have been known to the public without social media, particularly the food safety scandals and Bo Xilai/Neil Heywood scandal.

In common with American social media, the popularity of its Chinese counterparts has grown exponentially in recent years. With the success of post-PC mobile devices, social media gives people the ability to share information whenever they want, and wherever they are. David Brain says, “Users of both [American and Chinese social media] are highly active in sharing their opinions and information with their social networks. And both have a strong celebrity and influencer presence that helps shape trends and conversations.” Though still subject to censorship, Chinese social media is set to play a big role in the PR industry.

Unlike the Facebook- and Twitter-dominated market of American social media, China also has a broader spectrum in terms of the public's taste in social media sites. For example, an often unknown and therefore neglected site is Douban.com. A combination of social media, blog, and forum, Douban.com is much less prone to censorship. Users are younger and edgier, which makes it a preferred tool for small businesses and cultural events to promote themselves.

Microblog, or Weibo, is often considered the Chinese equivilant of Twitter, and is one of the leading pipelines for disseminating information and building brands. According to Bloomberg.com, it now has 300 million registered users and 100 million messages posted per day. In comparison with Twitter, it also integrates thread comments, which enhances its use as an information-distribution mechanism. Brain adds that “information is nonetheless travelling ever faster across social media in both China and the US. Organizations need to actively listen to the space for any news or talk about their industry or brands, and have a solid strategy for response and engagement.”

Nevertheless, one of the biggest differences in Chinese social media is the recent regulation on ID verification. In December 2011, the Chinese government introduced a regulation forcing all social media users to verify their identity by providing their ID card numbers before March 16, 2012. However, users do not need to use their real name on the websites. The measure was mainly introduced to control the spread of false rumors, zombie followers, and to increase the general credibility of information on social media websites. Some argue that this may undermine the “freedom of speech” of users, which is somewhat ironic since China was never a nation noted for its free speech.

Learning the lesson from the TV networks, which are ignoring the importance of online syndication providers to their detriment, PR firms in China need to treat social media as a top priority. As the new media takes over, the PR industry needs to adjust its modus operandi and use social media in a much more savvy way.

Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in

Would you like to post a comment?

Please Sign in or register.