THINKPIECE: Size doesn’t matter: your clients should value results, not how gargantuan your PR agency is

The CEO of a budding web site recently asked me why he should hire us instead of a ’name’ firm. Having been in the business for 10 years, I was confused by this query. What’s a name? Never one to say no to a challenge, I answered it without ’snarkiness.’

The CEO of a budding web site recently asked me why he should hire us instead of a ’name’ firm. Having been in the business for 10 years, I was confused by this query. What’s a name? Never one to say no to a challenge, I answered it without ’snarkiness.’

The CEO of a budding web site recently asked me why he should hire

us instead of a ’name’ firm. Having been in the business for 10 years, I

was confused by this query. What’s a name? Never one to say no to a

challenge, I answered it without ’snarkiness.’



If your clients are successful with the media, they rarely question how

big a name their PR firm has. Many of our people started at larger

’factory-type’ firms and they too excel at sending glossy daily reports

with little substance in them. We wrangle that habit out of people.

People know a smaller firm isn’t a ’yes bunch’ and sure, a lot of huge

companies get miffed when a PR company doesn’t send them a ’Guess what?’

memo every day. We just don’t. Most small firms don’t have the manpower

to do this.



If you, as we, choose to work with truly innovative and solid (read:

busy) businesses, you discover these folks would rather the PR pro is

doing the work - calling, faxing, paging, carrier-pigeoning the media -

than writing truck loads of memoranda.



If small firms are truly comprised of highly respected PR pros,

particularly in a space as crowded as new media, then highly respected

new media pros are going to be attracted to that firm. I can’t

understand why we should compare ourselves to ’better known’ anythings.

In fact, one of the world’s largest PR firms recently asked us to work

in partnership with them solely because they liked our ideas and

recognized the limits of their own.



An independent agency can make its own rules. Large firms do - unlike us

- hourly billings, have flashy production values, charge two to three

times our fees, and so on. We smaller types spend cash on hiring the

best new media PR pros available and on phone bills placing stories. In

short, we deliver results for a substantially lower cost than our name-

brand allies.



If your firm has highly skilled strategists and you take an aggressive

approach to getting out and talking with the media, that’s your calling

card. Large firms, unlike us, bill clients by the hour and often take up

to six months to formulate plans and market a message before any

pitching takes place. Small firms can’t afford to do that (and are bored

too easily).



Small firms are strategic partners. If a small budding brand wants a

real strategic partner, go with the hungry guys (so-called non-

names).



Because of a favorable staff/client ratio and controlled costs, clients

always know who’s working on their accounts.



We do not believe there is any reason to itemize differentiation. The

points mentioned above should be sufficient to demonstrate that a ’name’

is a moniker with a better press agent.



- Richard Laermer, author of The Native’s Guide To New York guidebook

series, is CEO of RLM Public Relations in his spare time.



Have you registered with us yet?

Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletins

Register
Already registered?
Sign in

Would you like to post a comment?

Please Sign in or register.