Co-op was never Lloyds contender

When two or more companies are competing in an auction to buy a third business, the investment bankers and accountants will do a forensic examination of rivals' accounts in the hope of uncovering signs of weakness.

Anthony Hilton: 'Those old doubts about whether the Co-op could afford to buy Lloyds branches turned out to be well founded.'
Anthony Hilton: 'Those old doubts about whether the Co-op could afford to buy Lloyds branches turned out to be well founded.'

Whenever any vulnerability is uncovered, it is quietly leaked to the media on the usual 'no fingerprints' basis. The idea is that the credibility of the rival as a serious owner of the sought-after asset is severely compromised. It is one of the more profitable dark arts strategies, although it can backfire.

After one high profile battle a few years ago where there the bidder was subject to an attack on its accounting policies, the Institute of Chartered Accountants launched a disciplinary action against one of its members who was named by the CEO of the bidder as the source of the information.

This was alleged to be unprofessional conduct. The hearing took place in private but I was a witness for the defence.

The relevance of this today is that for the past two years, Lloyds Bank has been trying to sell 600 branches because it has been ordered to by EU competition authorities as part of the price for receiving state aid.

In the early stages there were several potential buyers, one of which was the Co-op. The accounts of all potential buyers came under scrutiny, which the Co-op as a mutual had rarely had to endure before.

Though nothing wrong was uncovered, the forensic examination led to negative coverage that questioned whether the Co-op had the spare resources to complete on a deal of this size. However there was no firestorm, largely because of the vigour of the Co-op's PR advisers Tulchan, which countered that issues of interpretation were central to accounting and that the media needed to be careful not to be used to further another's agenda.

They dampened down the story and the Co-op emerged as the winner.

And then it all fell apart. Those old doubts about whether the Co-op could afford it turned out to be well founded. The group abruptly pulled out, its boss quit and the ratings agencies downgraded its credit.

Might it have been better to face reality 18 months ago? Surely it would.

Anthony Hilton is City commentator on London's Evening Standard

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

Hit or Miss? UKIP responds to Times story about Nigel Farage expenses

Hit or Miss? UKIP responds to Times story about Nigel Farage expenses

UKIP and its leader Nigel Farage came out fighting over a story in The Times yesterday that he is facing an investigation over £60,000 of "missing" European Union funds.

Ebay appoints Launch PR and Exposure for UK consumer work

Ebay appoints Launch PR and Exposure for UK consumer work

Online retailer eBay has appointed Launch PR and Exposure to its roster of agencies for UK consumer work.

Skyscanner selects Mischief for UK PR task

Skyscanner selects Mischief for UK PR task

Flight search company Skyscanner has brought in Mischief PR to oversee its UK communications as part of a Europe-wide round of agency appointments.