Was George Osborne right to bring Philpott case into benefits debate?

Public affairs professionals are divided over George Osborne's decision to reference the lifestyle of Mick Philpott, convicted this week of the manslaughter of six of his children, in the benefits debate.

George Osborne: Brought Philpott case into benefits debate
George Osborne: Brought Philpott case into benefits debate
The case of Philpott, a father of 17 who lived off thousands of pounds in benefits designed to support many of his children, was controversially picked up by the Daily Mail earlier this week to criticise the benefits system.

Philpott was jailed yesterday for a minimum of 15 years after being found guilty of the manslaughter of six of his children in a botched attempt to ensure they stayed at home.

Osborne’s intervention came amid coalition debates over the possibility of restricting child benefit to a family’s first two children, and provoked a stern response from his opposite number Ed Balls.

During a visit to Philpott's home town of Derby yesterday, Osborne said: ‘It’s right we ask questions as a government, as a society and as taxpayers whether it’s right that we subsidise lifestyles like these. It does need to be handled.’

Balls attacked the comments as the ‘cynical act of a desperate Chancellor’.

Lionel Zetter, public affairs director at APCO, backed Osborne’s comments, saying: ‘He is perfectly entitled to draw attention to the lifestyle that this family had become accustomed to as an extreme example of a lifestyle that has become not uncommon over the past decade or so, which is patently no longer sustainable.’

‘There is no doubt that George Osborne has become a bit of a magnet for criticism over welfare reforms, but it’s only right that he and Iain Duncan Smith should share the responsibility for explaining why these curbs are necessary and how they are going to be applied. Osborne has every right to enter the debate as the custodian of your and my hard-earned pounds.’

But Chris Rumfitt, managing director of public affairs at Edelman, believes the Chancellor’s comments ‘overstepped the mark’, though Labour was also ‘mistaken’.

‘The Chancellor has been a bit crude and clumsy, and he’s overstepped the mark,’ said Rumfitt. ‘But Labour’s response has been just as mistaken – being seen to defend the status quo when most people think that the benefits system needs to be reformed.

‘I don’t like what he’s done but in a sense Osborne has got what he wanted: to be seen as pro-reform, while Labour looks like it is anti-reform.’

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

We Are Social owner BlueFocus reports revenue growth of 65 per cent

We Are Social owner BlueFocus reports revenue growth of 65 per cent

Chinese marketing services group BlueFocus has reported a revenue increase of 64.8 per cent year on year to more than $578m (£343m) in 2013.

Three more agencies sign up to PR Internships For All campaign

Three more agencies sign up to PR Internships For All campaign

Brunswick, Cohn & Wolfe and MSL Group London have joined the PRWeek/PRCA initiative to boost diversity in the PR industry, which has also attracted support from Leeds Metropolitan University's Business School.

Seeing red: giving PR teams a real business objective

Seeing red: giving PR teams a real business objective

Speed Communications director John Brown talks client behaviours he can't stand.

Growing number of clients plan PR budget increases

Growing number of clients plan PR budget increases

The number of marketers planning to increase their PR budgets during 2014 has climbed, according to the latest quarterly Bellwether survey by the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising.