Drinks trade fights minimum pricing with 'Why should we pay more?' campaign

The wine and spirits industry is mustering a two-pronged public affairs and consumer PR fight against David Cameron's attempt to introduce a minimum price for alcohol.

Showing bottle: WSTA is taking on the PM over minimum pricing
Showing bottle: WSTA is taking on the PM over minimum pricing

With the Home Office considering proposals to set a floor price of 45p per alcohol unit, the Wine & Spirit Trade Association is attempting to mobilise public opinion. 

It has brought in Tetra Strategy and consumer agency Beige to help reach the public with a campaign taglined ‘Why should we pay more?’. 

The trade body is fighting the proposals on behalf of its 340 members, which include all four major supermarkets and drinks giants Diageo and Pernod Ricard. 

The issue pits the association against health bodies, including the British Medical Association, which claim minimum pricing is necessary to reduce binge drinking. 

The WSTA awarded the six-month project to its existing public affairs agency Tetra Strategy, which teamed up with Beige in a pitch against four other agencies. 

Tetra and Beige have launched a ‘Why should we pay more?’ website, Facebook page and Twitter account. The activity encourages people to sign a petition and contact their MP to express their opposition. 

The aim is to feed this groundswell of support into the political calculations surrounding the proposals. 

Cameron has championed minimum pricing despite Whitehall opposition, reportedly including Home Office minister Jeremy Browne. 

This week, London Mayor Boris Johnson swelled the ‘anti’ ranks by criticising the policy as ‘regressive’ and claiming it ‘hits poorest people hardest’. 

WSTA chief executive Miles Beale said the organisation had fully bought into Terra’s plan to run a co-ordinated campaign including elements of media management, social media, consumer PR and politics. 

He added: ‘Tetra’s expertise can support our campaign to persuade politicians to drop what would prove an ineffective policy that represents an unfair attack on people’s pockets.’ 

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

John Lewis to tell brand story with "tasteful" 150th anniversary celebrations

John Lewis to tell brand story with "tasteful" 150th anniversary celebrations

Department store John Lewis is to use its 150th anniversary this year to talk about its history, which "not enough people know about", according to director of communications Peter Cross.

Labour hires Obama election strategist David Axelrod to fight General Election

Labour hires Obama election strategist David Axelrod to fight General Election

The man who helped Barack Obama win the 2008 and 2012 US presidential elections is to work for Labour along with members of his team.

Sky adds Fever PR to its roster after splitting with Cake

Sky adds Fever PR to its roster after splitting with Cake

Pay-TV giant Sky has added Fever PR to its agency line-up for a wide-ranging brief covering products and services.

Max Clifford trial jury to continue deliberations after Easter break

Max Clifford trial jury to continue deliberations after Easter break

The jury in the trial of celebrity publicist Max Clifford has been sent home for Easter and will reconvene on Tuesday for further deliberations about its verdicts on 11 charges of indecent assault.

Home Office brings in Munro & Forster to campaign against FGM

Home Office brings in Munro & Forster to campaign against FGM

The Home Office has tasked Munro & Forster (M&F) with supporting its campaign to eradicate female genital mutilation (FGM) as part of a wider retained brief.