Drinks trade fights minimum pricing with 'Why should we pay more?' campaign

The wine and spirits industry is mustering a two-pronged public affairs and consumer PR fight against David Cameron's attempt to introduce a minimum price for alcohol.

Showing bottle: WSTA is taking on the PM over minimum pricing
Showing bottle: WSTA is taking on the PM over minimum pricing

With the Home Office considering proposals to set a floor price of 45p per alcohol unit, the Wine & Spirit Trade Association is attempting to mobilise public opinion. 

It has brought in Tetra Strategy and consumer agency Beige to help reach the public with a campaign taglined ‘Why should we pay more?’. 

The trade body is fighting the proposals on behalf of its 340 members, which include all four major supermarkets and drinks giants Diageo and Pernod Ricard. 

The issue pits the association against health bodies, including the British Medical Association, which claim minimum pricing is necessary to reduce binge drinking. 

The WSTA awarded the six-month project to its existing public affairs agency Tetra Strategy, which teamed up with Beige in a pitch against four other agencies. 

Tetra and Beige have launched a ‘Why should we pay more?’ website, Facebook page and Twitter account. The activity encourages people to sign a petition and contact their MP to express their opposition. 

The aim is to feed this groundswell of support into the political calculations surrounding the proposals. 

Cameron has championed minimum pricing despite Whitehall opposition, reportedly including Home Office minister Jeremy Browne. 

This week, London Mayor Boris Johnson swelled the ‘anti’ ranks by criticising the policy as ‘regressive’ and claiming it ‘hits poorest people hardest’. 

WSTA chief executive Miles Beale said the organisation had fully bought into Terra’s plan to run a co-ordinated campaign including elements of media management, social media, consumer PR and politics. 

He added: ‘Tetra’s expertise can support our campaign to persuade politicians to drop what would prove an ineffective policy that represents an unfair attack on people’s pockets.’ 

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

Max Clifford trial jury finishes sixth day of deliberations

Max Clifford trial jury finishes sixth day of deliberations

The jury in the trial of celebrity publicist Max Clifford on 11 charges of indecent assault has been sent home and will reconvene tomorrow morning for a seventh day of deliberations.

Analysis: Fishburn chiefs keep eyes on future despite mounting departures

Analysis: Fishburn chiefs keep eyes on future despite mounting departures

Fishburn's management have defended their reinvention of the 23-year-old agency amid industry mutterings, fed by a series of director-level departures, about the direction in which it is going.

Hit or Miss? EasyJet backs Shakespeare Day campaign with world record attempt

Hit or Miss? EasyJet backs Shakespeare Day campaign with world record attempt

EasyJet aimed to break the world record for the highest ever theatrical performance for Shakespeare's 450th birthday yesterday with the Reduced Shakespeare Company performing on a flight from Gatwick to Verona.

Top PRs to gather in Barcelona for inaugural PRWeek Global Congress

Top PRs to gather in Barcelona for inaugural PRWeek Global Congress

Senior executives from IBM, Nestlé, Vedanta, GE, Cargill, Philips and Allianz will be among the speakers at PRWeek's first Global Congress.