At the session, Zetter said that the industry would embrace measures that enhanced its professional standards and highlighted good ethical practice.
Commenting on the discussion, Zetter said: ‘Both the consultation document and the questioning from the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee show that there is broad support for a statutory register. There is not, however, any appetite for bureaucratic and expensive regulation.’
Also providing oral evidence were Tamasin Cave of the Alliance for Lobbying Transparency and professor Justin Fisher, from Brunel University.
The 12-week consultation, which is seeking views on issues including the definition of a lobbyist, has caused controversy with the suggestion in-house PR professionals could be excluded from any register set up.
A spokesperson for the CIPR said: ‘Lionel’s comments are in line with the CIPR’s view that a statutory register should be universal, have no "good cause" exemptions and provide a level playing field in lobbying.’
Have you registered with us yet?
Register now to enjoy more articles and free email bulletinsRegister
Already registered?Sign in
Join a growing community of PRWeek comms professionals today
- Read more articles each month
- Sign up for free specialised news bulletins