England's 2018 World Cup bid: 2018 bid on the skids

The vast majority of the public believes England's 2018 World Cup bid will be damaged by The Sunday Times' allegations of corruption at FIFA, new figures show.

The Sunday Times' investigation into corruption at FIFA will damage England 2018's bid, according to three-quarters of the 3,000 respondents to PRWeek/One Poll's latest survey.

The research found that 38 per cent of people said the story published on 17 October, which claimed two FIFA officials offered to sell their votes ahead of December's decision on the host country of the 2018 World Cup, would damage the bid. A further 38 per cent of people expected FIFA to deny that the story will affect the bid, when really it will.

Only 22 per cent believe that England will still win the 2018 World Cup bid, with 44 per cent saying England would lose and 34 per cent saying they did not know.

But 69 per cent of respondents said The Sunday Times was right to publish the story because it exposed wrongdoing. Only 11 per cent said it should not have published because the risk of harming the bid was too high.

And 48 per cent of people believed that concern over the British media's negative reports about FIFA was just a way to make the media scapegoats should England lose the bid.

When choosing a host country, 27 per cent of respondents believed safety was the most important factor, with 20 per cent citing the availability of suitable venues and 17 per cent choosing the impact the tournament would have on local people.

Nearly half of respondents said the allegations were very damaging to FIFA, and a further 48 per cent said they were quite damaging. Just four per cent believed they did not damage FIFA's reputation.

- Survey of 3,000 members of the public conducted by global research agency OnePoll.

HOW I SEE IT - Rachel Froggatt, Head of sport, Braben

It is interesting that while 76 per cent of those surveyed believe The Sunday Times investigation will impact the England 2018 bid, almost 70 per cent still believe it was right to expose alleged wrongdoing among FIFA officials, even if it means losing the bid. In view of this and the fact that 96 per cent of respondents believe the allegations have damaged FIFA's reputation, it is clear this is a serious issue for FIFA to overcome.

We have seen time and time again just how integral media can be to the success of sporting bids. But equally, it is encouraging to see such public support for legitimate investigative journalism. You could argue the investigations should help underline the UK's commitment to delivering a global sporting event in a fair, professional and competent fashion. It would be an interesting twist if the UK media could now be encouraged to co-ordinate an Olympics-style united front and jointly call for football to come home.

- Do you think that The Sunday Times investigation into corruption at FIFA will damage England's 2018 bid?

Officials say it won't, but really it will - 38%

Yes - 38%

No - 24%

*It was a selfish bid to increase circulation **The risk of harming the England bid was too high.

- Do you think The Sunday Times was right to publish the investigation?

No** - 11%

No* - 20%

Yes, it exposed wrongdoing - 69%

- Do you think people are expressing concern over the media's reports about FIFA so they have someone to blame if England lose the bid?

No opinion - 26%

Yes - 47.5%

No - 26.5%

Panorama

53% of respondents believed the BBC should move the timing of its Panorama investigation into World Cup bidding to 15 November, rather than screen it when the vote is taken on the host

Brazil

53% said they would be concerned about visiting Brazil for the 2014 World Cup due to safety reasons

Corruption

48% agreed that the allegations of corruption were very damaging to FIFA

Investment & Tourism

39% believed that an increase in foreign investment and tourism was the biggest advantage of hosting a World Cup

Winning the bid

22% believed that England would win the 2018 World Cup bid.

Before commenting please read our rules for commenting on articles.

If you see a comment you find offensive, you can flag it as inappropriate. In the top right-hand corner of an individual comment, you will see 'flag as inappropriate'. Clicking this prompts us to review the comment. For further information see our rules for commenting on articles.

comments powered by Disqus

Latest Articles

Growing number of clients plan PR budget increases

Growing number of clients plan PR budget increases

The number of marketers planning to increase their PR budgets during 2014 has climbed, according to the latest quarterly Bellwether survey by the Institute of Practitioners in Advertising.

Max Clifford trial jury to continue deliberations tomorrow

Max Clifford trial jury to continue deliberations tomorrow

The jury in the trial of celebrity publicist Max Clifford has been sent home after a second day of deliberations about its verdicts on 11 charges of indecent assault.

Champagne producer Charles Heidsieck appoints Story PR